← All episodes

The Talent Pipeline: Stacey Dietsch Talks about the Future of HR

March 10, 2024 ·40 minutes

Guest: Stacey Dietsch

Business and Community

Stacey Dietsch specializes in human potential. After almost two decades with a national consulting firm, Stacey became the Executive Vice President of Talent at Liberty Mutual Insurance earlier this year. Drawing upon her educational background in psychology, Stacey has developed an expansive understanding of the nuanced world of human resources over the course of her professional career. Stacey seeks to align personal motivations with organizational objectives, enhancing job satisfaction and productivity. She champions a growth mindset and emphasizes the importance of creating a workplace that nurtures potential and embraces diversity of thought. Join our conversation with Stacey Dietsch today on Radio Maine.

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Lightly cleaned for readability.

Today I am speaking with Stacy Dietsch, who is the Executive Vice President of Talent at Liberty Mutual Insurance. Nice to have you here with me today. Nice to be here. I love that we are now calling it talent and we are now thinking of people as not just the workforce, but it's like, oh, these are individuals who are actually coming in and bringing value to our organizations and we need to figure out how to not only attract them, but retain them. And you have spent 20 years doing this work. So let's first talk, why is it that you decided that you wanted to get into this field? I had an amazing professor of psychology when I was in college and I'd always loved people and getting to know people, different people with different backgrounds, and I didn't realize that you could do this as a job when you're a kid. There are doctors and lawyers and police people, and I just didn't know really much about business and I didn't know that there was this human side of business that was equally important to delivering on whatever it is that you were selling or serving to your customers. And this wonderful professor showed me how important it was to think about the humans who are actually doing the work. So you got your BA in psychology at NYU. Yes. And what caused you to decide to go down that path? Why did you say, oh, psychology, I like learning about people. Was there some sort of moment in your educational career where you said, yes, I'm going in this direction? Yes, it was that first teacher who showed me that that was a path that had lots of different ways that you could go down and explore the different parts of the human mind, and you could think about it in the clinical sense and you could think about it in the organizational sense. I just was curious to see those were the classes that really sparked my interest and I just wanted to keep digging in more and more. It's interesting because it's just lasted in my free time. I do so much listening of podcasts around neuroscience and human behavior. It just is what sparks me. See, I'm fascinated by this too, and I love sitting with people and being like, oh, I'd like to get to know them a little bit better and where they came from their context. And I think it is incredibly important in business because even though we're all trying to meet metrics and we're all trying to get to our limb goals, it really is the people who make that happen. So without the people, none of these things move forward, but you also have to understand what motivates people, what keeps them motivated. And that's not necessarily an easy task because it's like an iceberg. You only get to see the tip of it At work. That's right. And that's why I think the organizations that do find that connection to somebody's individual purpose and show how it matters and contributes to the purpose of the organization are the ones that end up thriving. If you're able to balance performance and that people side, it's just a mutually reinforcing focus and it does take digging. One of the things we were talking about just recently at my new organization is thinking about how do we help people in that recruitment process get under their own iceberg? Because sometimes people haven't even had the chance to reflect on actually, why do I love what I love and is there a way to translate what I love into the work that I'm going to do? So we're thinking about some reflection, quizzes, questions, and then some ways that you can match that to the work that's being done so people can see, oh, okay, this is going to make me feel good when I come to work every day. And feeling good then of course makes people want to come to work every day and contribute. That's Really interesting because what you actually want people to know is more about themselves. That's right. Because we want them to bring their whole selves to work. And it's one of the things that you use the word human, and that's exactly what we're trying to help people see is that we want them to feel they can bring their authentic human full selves to work. And that is taking the time to understand themselves, allows them to then understand each other better and create that diversity also of backgrounds, experiences, perspectives on a team. And it does take reflection and it does take questioning in order to figure out how that group of people is going to come together and do something that not one person could do on their own. That's interesting to me because it seems as though it's a continual balance of what the individual wants, needs expects, and what the team wants, needs expects, and you simultaneously need things to be a good fit. So the team works well together and also inclusive of different viewpoints. And increasingly we know that that's incredibly important because if you just have the team all working together and nobody ever brings up anything that's outside of their normal conversation, no creativity happens. So how do you achieve that? How do you kind of move all of these pieces forward simultaneously? I Think so much is the composition of the team itself and being really deliberate about how you bring in people with different backgrounds onto a team. I remember having a conversation when I was a consultant with a very senior executive, and I was sort of in awe of him just as a person. But I loved his humility when he was talking about the way that he created his team. Because he said, whenever I have an opening on my team, I get out a piece of paper and I write down all the things I'm good at, all the things the other people at my team are good at, and then all the things that we're missing. And I hire for those things that are missing because I know that I need to acknowledge my blind spots and those gaps that I have in myself and the rest of the team. And we'll be better if we bring in people with different strengths to contribute in a different way. Understanding what one isn't good at can be a little, yeah, humility is a good word for it. It can be very humbling. And some people have a blind spot when it comes to that. I mean, it's easy to believe, oh, well, I must be smart enough. I got a degree and I'm a professional here. So this person sounds like he's evolved to that place. Do you ever run into situations where you have a sense, oh, I think this person's not quite there yet, this person needs to spend some more time understanding what could be done to compliment their Skills? Yes, absolutely. And I think sometimes it's people don't even know what that full set of skills should be for their roles. And so that's the first part, and that's where I think the organization has a responsibility to be thoughtful about putting together expectations for a role and saying, this is the knowledge we think you need. These are the skills, these are the attributes or mindsets we're looking for, and the experiences that really come together to make somebody successful enroll and giving people a chance to do a self-assessment and then to have that self-assessment validated by their leader gives them a sense of where are my strengths and where are those things that I can continue to develop? And there's such a movement now to say, how do we personalize your development experience based on that set of skills and opportunities? And really I think the way that it can be very motivating for people is to be thinking about it in terms of where do they want to go next? So yes, there is enrolled development that might need to happen, and it's in service of a future aspiration. So it feels less like this is a gap to fix and more like this could be a springboard for where you want to go in your career in the future. Recently in our organization, our chief human resources officer has brought forward this idea of development plans, and it's been an interesting conversation because development plans are very different than performance assessments. They require a lot of thought. They require a lot of collaboration with the person. And also if you're thinking about where that person wants to go next, it may not be with you. That's right. So you, you're working very hard to get the person to a place that maybe is somewhere else and in fact probably will be. Given what we know about today's market, What a great point, and also something that can be framed very positively. One of the things that we're talking about in our organization at Liberty Mutual is that succession planning is the responsibility of every leader. And we want a criterion for promotion to be the fact that you have a slate of potential candidates to fill your role and that it is an expectation of a leader to invest in the development of their team. And it's actually rewarded because it's a part of that next level of advancement. You've created followership that people want to work with you because they know they'll be developed and they know they'll get to do good work, and that you're actually going to invest in preparing them for their own promotion so you can be promoted as well. And I think one of the things that you said is really important is this notion of development plan. In the past, a lot of people had talked about improvement plans and just that framing alone is such a nice change and development growth. It's really about forward momentum. And that could be in role and it could be a promotion and it's mutual then if it's the leader is thinking about everybody on the team, including him or herself. For me, it aligns with this idea of not yet. If you are in education, if you're a learning oriented organization, maybe people aren't there, but they're not there yet. It doesn't mean that they can't get there. And I think that it's kind of interesting because we've come from a place where we assume, well, if you have a degree in whatever it is and you come through our door, then you're ready to go. But that can't be true. It can't possibly be true because any organization you're going to go to is going to have its own set of needs and roles, and even while you're there, they could be evolving as a result of recently, say AI for example. So we actually have to be engaged in learning and creating learning organizations. How do you move a company away from this idea that, well, they've got an MBA, so they must be good to go to, they have an MBA, but that's a foundational level of understanding and we're going to have to layer on That. I think it really is that expectation setting at the beginning that is both the expectation that you're setting with the candidate and with the hiring manager, both of whom need to understand that really the most important things to hire for are those foundational skills of the future. Things like problem solving things like you said, a growth mindset and curiosity. Yes, having some awareness of how technology plays a role in your job, not necessarily being a coder, but knowing that technology is a layer that needs to be considered in any opportunity and that there will be onboarding into the role that you have today. And we want to hire people who have a flexibility, somebody who's not going to be looking at the job description and questioning, oh, you're asking me to do something that's not quite listed here, but rather, oh wow, this job is changing because the external context is changing, our strategic objectives are changing, our culture is changing, and I want to change along with that because it is going to be a new and exciting challenge. So I think it starts with setting the expectations and then really filtering for that curiosity and growth mindset in the interviewing process. I know in healthcare, we're not any different than anywhere else, and we've been talking about the four different generations that are simultaneously coexisting in our group. So we still have quite a few very healthy baby boomers. We have a lot of Gen Xers, we have millennials, and now we have Gen Y. And everybody came from a different context, a different timeframe. They communicate differently. And it's interesting because we're still, unfortunately, I think in a place where we're saying, well, why doesn't that next generation understand now how good they have it and how hard I had it back here? I think it's fascinating because as somebody who's Gen X, the people in front of us were saying the same thing about our generation. That's exactly where I was going in my brain when you were talking. So I mean it's the same. We're just repeating the same course. It's like, well, these people aren't like me and I don't know why. So how do we get beyond this idea? We sure do have different contexts and why wouldn't we? But how do we learn to understand one another and communicate and collaborate? I think one of the things that's interesting is so in addition to the fact that the cycle just continues to repeat, we did a study, I remember when I was at McKinsey where we were thinking, oh gosh, well we have all of these different generations. They must really want different things out of their career. You had heard millennials saying, well, I just need development. I want to be promoted quickly. And when we did a survey that was people filling in a form online, it turned out everybody wanted the same thing. They were just asking for it differently, maybe not even asking for it at all because they were shy about that. It just wasn't supported to be vocal about your career aspirations in other generations. And so the millennials openness about it actually created more space for others to be able to ask for what they wanted and needed too. And so that's what I come back to is this, how do we listen to all of the different voices that are in the room and make sure that people feel heard? Because the more different ideas get out there, the more other people may feel comfortable asking for things that are universal needs, but just they hadn't built the skills or felt the safety to express 'em in the past. I Think that's really important. And one of the things that I've always enjoyed is working with people who have a broad range of experiences, and I never assume that I know more people who are younger than me or maybe that I know well more or less than people who are older than me. And what I've seen recently is this sort of push, well, I write for an organization called Doximity, which gathers opinions from practitioners across the country. And I've seen a couple of things come through that are millennials are so glad that the people ahead of them are finally leaving the leadership. And I'm like, huh, I'm one of those people that I'm not really quite ready to go yet. I value what they bring to the table. I'm not sure that I feel is valued. How do we make sure that everybody continually is feeling valued for whatever experience it is, whether you've been somewhere a long time, whether you're very fresh in the market, but you also have a background that goes back into high school, perhaps it's very different. How do we value people and how do we communicate that value? I love that question so much. And the first thing that comes to mind is just the power of storytelling opportunities like this. I think organizations can do more of the highlighting of different profiles across the organization to show the value that people bring. I think it's a way to also introduce people coming into the organization to lots of different jobs and also lots of different perspectives. I read a book from Strength to Strength by Arthur Brooks, which really talked about this shift in intelligence that comes in the second half of life, let's say. And I thought that that was such an interesting way to talk about the different contributions a younger generation versus a older generation can bring. The younger generation has this really fluid intelligence. They're constantly learning different things and innovating and just quick in terms of that analytical processing power. Whereas the older generation, it's not that their intelligence drops off, it's actually becomes crystallized. And what that means is you're able to pull all of the different pieces of your past experience together into a framework and to be able to connect dots and to be able to explain things in a way that is more advanced than some of the younger generations because you have so much more to pull together and share back. And that's one of the things that I think is really neat is this apprenticeship mindset, being a coach, being a sponsor, being a mentor to the younger generation. And if you really enter it in that spirit of coaching that the person you're coaching has so much to offer too. So it just feels so much like a win-win when you're having those conversations, the younger generation teaches and learns and vice versa. As you're talking, I'm thinking about this idea of reverse mentoring. So you're not assuming that because you are older or have more experience that what you're bringing to the table is more important. We actually can bring other people who are maybe younger into this conversation and they can mentor us in their own way. Exactly. It's not more important, it's just different. And that's so neat is we have these younger people who've grown up with their technology and we've grown up writing and processing information in our ways, and we come together and then we're more helpful to whoever our stakeholders are because of both of those perspectives and both of those skill sets. One of the things that you mentioned earlier is this idea of succession planning. And I've seen that this can be very challenging, particularly in fields like healthcare where you've been, well, I mean you spent almost 20 years in McKinsey, so I'm sure that over time you worked very hard, you've developed a certain set of skills, you developed a perspective. And I think not everybody has an easy time letting go of all of those things and kind of moving onto the next thing. So you may have a defined succession plan, but if you haven't quite gotten there yourself, you're not ready to have that plan play out. Have you ever been in situations like that where you've met people and you're like, I think this person's ready to go, but they're not ready to Go? Definitely. And I think that there are ways to, when you're in that situation, it's very hard because then it takes mostly tough courageous conversations with that person if you feel truly that person's, it almost sounds like a fixed mindset. I'm here, I have my offering and I don't see a path for me to leave. But what we need is more of that flexibility to bring in new ideas. I think those conversations are really hard when you've just gotten there. And what we're seeing a lot of organizations do to mitigate that risk is have a lot more frequent conversations, a lot more transparency around the importance of movement and change in an organization and trying to paint that genuinely as an opportunity for everybody because it's wonderful for new ideas to come into any team, including for that person who may not be ready to retire, but potentially there's a way for that person's skills to be a contribution to another team, and then they get to learn too, and hopefully they see how that ends up being rewarding for them too. I agree with what you're saying, and I think that when I read the email tagline from Doximity and it talks about finally the older generation is leaving, so now we can get started out of the work. I think that's where I take it, is that it probably, it is actually really difficult to come into a place and see somebody who's sort of squatting like, here I am, I not going anywhere. And if they do have a fixed mindset, you can't really go anywhere with that. So I think going back to your psychology background, and a lot of it has to do with identity, and if you build an identity around whatever stage of your professional life you're in, it's hard to leave that identity behind. That's exactly right. And it comes back to some of the things we were talking about at the beginning I think is how do you as an individual and how does the organization help that individual have moments of reflection to talk about, to acknowledge and honor that identity and help somebody chart a course that keeps movement in their own evolution as a person. Because of course, even with retirement, you have the potential to keep learning and growing and doing new things. And I think so many times we get on this treadmill where we keep moving, but we keep moving in what's familiar to us, and sometimes you need to stop the treadmill so that you can look around and acknowledge and be grateful for who you are and what you've done and where you've been. And sometimes it's just that different perspective that will allow that person to open their minds to a new possibility, but we have to create the space for it. I think that's the key. You've got to stop the treadmill in order for people to be able to have a new thing to look at in themselves and others. That's so true. I think it's creating the space for people to be reflective, and I think there's also a creating of space for additional roles that go beyond whatever role they're in now. And when I think about, for example, medicine, just because that happens to be my field, I mean it traditionally has been sort of an apprentice journeyman trajectory, and we traditionally have had older practitioners who kind of stay on as mentors and coaches and teachers. And because of the way business has gone, we've needed those people to stay in the trenches seeing patients all the time, generating revenue. And I wonder if we can't find a way back, can we find a way back so that you don't have to see patients all the time, for example, you can help learners who are coming through who are the next generation of practitioners. Again, it's the value. How do we value another role that maybe doesn't get paid the same way in a business but is still really important. Do you have thoughts on that? I think that's a tough one. I think the value piece is tough because it is both. How is that role valued and seen in the organization and what is the need of the person? In terms of your comment on compensation? I think it's tough to take a step back. And the question is, one of the things that I think can be a neat offering to people who may need to step away from align work and go into more of that teaching coaching role is how do you open up opportunities for them maybe outside of the day-to-Day, to be a coach that has its own revenue stream or to be a board member that again also has a revenue stream. So there are ways to think about it being compensated for your wisdom and expertise differently. And the key is how do you show that that shift out of the line and into the coaching supportive leader role is valued in terms of just reward and recognition and celebration of that person and showing how the coaching that they do helps the other person be more impactful in their day-to-day work. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. And I wonder if, because we've traditionally had this idea in our society that everybody retires at, well, it's getting older and older, but we've had this idea at one point it was 55, the American Association of Retired People, they start reaching out to people at 49. I don't know that many people who are going to be ready to retire at 50 through 55. I don't think our financial structure is set up the way in this country, but maybe not even 65. I mean, people are healthier longer, they're living active lives. We want them to. So how do we look at a longer life and outside of let's say a traditional job, like be a board member, be a coach, be a mentor. I mean, there's the Service Corps of retired executives that exist. I mean, this kind of thing is out there, but can we touch back into it in a way that's meaningful? I really love that, and it is one of the reasons that I wanted to move to Maine is I really wanted to find a place that you could feel like your contributions to the community were meaningful and could be felt. And it's also something that I remember hearing a lot about in Covid is that it was a real disruption to people's identity when they couldn't be at work every day with their colleagues at work because everything that they were doing in their lives was at work or around work. And what they realized was that we've lost a little bit of that community service, community organization as a part of somebody's life. And that's what I'm hoping we can go back to. And to your point of living a more holistic life, even earlier than just as you're ready to potentially retire or go into a second career. But how do we show people that they can contribute their intelligence, their expertise to organizations and their communities and see how, see the impact in the people and the organizations that touch their lives and the lives of others really nearby. Since you've opened up this door, tell me why one would, after almost two decades with McKinsey decide, oh, I'm going to do something different now. Was it a covid realization? Did you have to yourself as your own talent have to do some examination? And what did that look like for you as someone who always had been the person on the outside to be the person on the inside doing this sort of self-evaluation? Absolutely. It really was the Covid. I used that treadmill stopping because that's exactly what it felt like to me. I had just been going in a direction that was comfortable and known, and then when it stopped and my little family, we were all in the same house together for 24 hours a day, I was able to see things differently and it was a total and complete reset. I realized I wanted to reduce the travel I was doing as a consultant. And there was also exactly what you said, this desire to be more a part of what I was doing, and that was more a part of my family. It was more a part of my community and it was more a part of the work. So what I was looking for was a way to find an organization whose purpose I believed in deeply, whose team I would be just thrilled to be a part of, and really feel accountable for not just the initial ideas and the plans, but actually taking it all the way to impact and understanding that that journey from the plan to the impact is a wild one sometimes there's so much change and so much learning and so much humanity in that, and I wanted to be a part of that. It was so much the big aha for me in Covid was the desire to just get closer to everything I was doing and be in the moment so much more. And that's what really translated into the desire to move from consulting into an organization that I Care about. And you alluded to moving to Maine. Where were you moving from? I began my life. I was born in Washington DC and I began my McKinsey career also in Washington DC after lots of moves. Our family though moved to Mexico City for three years or two and a half years, about six years ago. And so we were living in Mexico City. We'd been coming to Maine for summers for about 11 years. And while we were in Mexico City, we just had this conversation, where do we love more than anywhere in the world? And it was Maine. And so we decided that we would try to find a place here that was our family's place and we did. And we did before the pandemic and then lived there for six months of the pandemic. And that's when we said, okay, instead of going back to DC let's go forward to Maine. And that's what brought us here. Are you seeing People who made decisions during Covid because they're like, oh my life, I don't like what it was. I'm reevaluating, I'm going to make a change now. Are you seeing anybody who's been like, oh wait, I'm not sure I made that decision in a way that really makes sense moving forward. Are you seeing people kind of reverse decisions? I definitely have, and I've seen a few people actually who are our friends here in Maine actually move back to where they came from. And that's also a neat part of life to be able to try something and have the privilege of returning or trying something else. So I think the shakeup was amazing, obviously in the midst of a tragedy for many, but there are learnings that people had very personally about what they do need in their life context. And sometimes that can take you back to where you came from and sometimes it continues to take you to new places. In your work as the executive vice president of talent at Liberty Mutual, are you seeing people who are maybe coming back to work for Liberty Mutual who had left during the pandemic and are saying, oh, you know what? I actually really did like that job and I really would like to come back. I'm so new there that I don't know those patterns as much, but what I do know is there's of course the return to office philosophy and approach that lots of organizations are going through. Liberty Mutual is no exception. What I've thought is really neat is that this is 112 year old organization that is in the insurance business, obviously, and yet they've really adapted to a new way of working because of covid. So casual clothing and a hybrid work policy that is two days a week on site. And they also have a remote community as well. And what I'm seeing is while some people again felt like, oh gosh, that's a shakeup. I've been working at home and now I'm going back to the office. I think that's part of what's also changing is the recognition that it is really nice to be with people in person and be able to connect, be able to build those relationships, be able to do that innovative brainstorming kind of work. And then it's equally nice to go home and sit at their computer and look out their window and hear the kids come home from school. So I am seeing a return to in-person work, but in just such a different way that is much more balanced that I am really thinking is a nice direction for us all to go. Yes, I would agree with that. And I think that what I would continue to hope is that through this just remarkable disruption, and in many ways tragedy that happened globally can benefit in some way because if we can't and we just say, well, that's just two or to three years of my life lost, then what? That's so unfortunate. But if we can say, well, okay, but what did we learn here and how do we integrate this moving forward? I think in some ways you can say, well, it's not like I would've chosen this, but maybe it made the fact that we went all through this a little bit more palatable. Absolutely. And I think, not to bring this all back to talent practices and the way that we approach work, but that to me, that philosophy of looking for the learning in all of the hard moments is something that I really hope is a theme from that time that we carry forward in all that we do. It does correspond to some of the ways that, like we talked about, the younger generation is shaking things up for us and wanting us to work with more agility work faster, which of course means that we sometimes don't succeed in the things that we're doing, and we ruffle feathers in ways that were unintended. And the key is, well, what do we learn from that and how does it make us and our

More Radio Maine episodes Be a guest